Ulysses Essay 4 (9:25)
Chapter 1 (Telemachus) No. 4
“A bowl of bitter waters”
Looking down from the tower at Dublin Bay, the scene of a
recent drowning, and described by the egregiously crude Malachi Mulligan only a
moment ago as “the snotgreen sea”, Stephen is reminded of the bowl of green
bilious vomit at his dying mother’s bedside. Immediately, the “bitter water” of
the Book of Numbers (5:17-21) seeps into his consciousness. Mosaic Law dictates
here that if a jealous husband suspects that his wife has had a sexual
relationship with another man, although definite proof of the affair is lacking,
he is at liberty to subject her to a trial by ordeal conducted by a priest who
has been engaged for this purpose in return for a “jealousy offering” of barley
meal. The priest fills an “earthen vessel” with “holy water” and the wife, having
denied the charge of adultery, is instructed to drink the “bitter water” after
being told that if she is indeed innocent of the charge, all will be well, but
warning her, “Im at satit” (“If you have gone astray” i.e., been
sexually unfaithful), God would cause her “belly to swell” and her “thigh to
rot”.
Trial by ordeal for suspected adultery seems to have been
commonplace in the ancient Middle East (the Hammurabic code specifies a similar
process) and in other cultures. The Talmud devotes a whole tractate “Sotah”
– “The Deviant Woman” – to the issue, deriving the name of the tractate from
the biblical word “satit” (“you went astray). The psychological basis of
the ritual was probably based on the assumption that a frightened woman who had
indeed had an extramarital sexual liaison would rather confess to her misdoing than
undergo the terrifying consequences of having her “guilt” revealed by the
“bitter water”. In any event after the destruction of the Second Temple in 70
C.E., the entire rigmarole was abandoned along with all the other sacrificial
rituals that were so integral to the Temple service, although orthodox Jewish
liturgy still recalls them with longing, especially on festival days, and most
of all on Yom Kippur, when, as described in the midday Musaf prayer, the High
Priest would make his once a year entrance to the innermost sanctum of the
Temple, “the Holy of Holies”, where he would pronounce God’s ineffable name
“loudly and clearly” while beseeching forgiveness on behalf of the nation.
However, the term “soteh” (the masculine of “sotah”)
and its derivative noun “stiyah” live on in Modern Hebrew. They are
still in use as a collective appellation for far-out sexual deviancies (such as
pedophilia), but more commonly they simply imply “off track”, as when a
discussant wanders away from the subject under debate or a driver does not stick
to his or her correct lane. And perhaps the most utter demythologization of the
biblical “sotah” is its derivative usage in Israeli statistical jargon, where
“stiyat teken” refers to nothing more than the standard deviation from
the norm.
Comments
Post a Comment