Ulysses
Essay 40 (61:31)
Chapter 5 (Lotus-Eaters)
No. 1
“ Bethel. El, yes: house of: Aleph, Beth.”
At the conclusion of the “Calypso” episode, we find Bloom
satisfactorily emptying his bowels in his outhouse while reading a prize short
story entitled “Matcham’s Masterstroke” in Tidbits, a popular
weekly newsmagazine. He notes that the author, Mr. Philip Beaufoy, earned the
not inconsiderable sum of three pounds thirteen and six for his effort, and
wonders whether he and Molly could also write such a prize-winning story.
Beaufoy’s story, however, goes the way of all flesh, when Bloom, having
finished reading, tears up the magazine and uses one half of Matcham’s
Masterstroke to wipe himself. My immediate association with this episode
takes me back to Issy Kahanowitz’s 1958 matriculation history class at King
David High School in Johannesburg. Mr Kahanowitz, a born teacher, would tend to
emulate Stephen Dedalus by often wandering away from the dry stuff of history.
One day he somehow got onto Ulysses and explained to us that Joyce’s book
dealt with the events of a single day in the life of one Leopold Bloom, and
that it especially concentrated on Bloom’s thought processes or, as he put
it, his
“stream of consciousness” during that day. To illustrate the point he
told us that the book even described what Bloom was thinking about as he sat on
the lavatory seat and worked his bowels. This shocked us, because South Africa
in 1958 was puritanical in the extreme and any mention of excretory (or sexual)
behavior was utterly taboo at school or at home (although the future Nobel
prizewinner Nadime Gordimer had begun to break these shackles with the
publication of “The Lying Days” in 1953).
While making his way to the outhouse, Bloom wonders if he
has enough time to indulge himself at the public bath house before Patty Dignam’s
funeral, the main item on his morning agenda, and for which he intends to meet his
fellow mourners at eleven for the ride to the cemetery. Leaving his Eccles
Street home at ten o’clock, he decides that indeed he has more than enough time
in hand, and so he enjoyably plans a rather roundabout hour-long walk through
Dublin to incorporate a stop at the Westland Row sub-branch post office to
check whether a Poste Restante letter from a clandestine female correspondent
named Martha Griffith and addressed to “Henry Flower” has arrived; a period of
reflection while sitting in a pew at All Hallows (St. Andrew’s Church); a call-in at Sweny’s pharmacy on Lincoln
Place to order a bottle of “sweet almond oil” skin care lotion for Molly and to
buy a bar of lemon soap for himself; and
finally a visit to the nearby Leinster Street Turkish and Warm Baths to enjoy a
luxurious (and perhaps mastubatory) hot bath.
Pursuing his plan for his free morning hour, Bloom crosses
the Liffey River on the cast iron pedestrian “Ha’penny Bridge” (so called
because at the time a toll of half a penny was charged to users) and strolls
eastward for a while on Sir John Rogerson’s Quay following the south bank of
the Liffey. He then turns right (southward) on Lime Street and then doubles
back westward on the north sidewalk of Hanover Street East which runs into
Townsend Street. After one more block he crosses Townsend Street and then turns
south again on Lombard Street East making for Westland Row post office. As he
passes 19-20 Lombard Street he takes in the “frowning face” of the
Bethel Salvation Army Hostel. Since Joyce’s time, the hostel has been replaced
by a modern building, and as there does not seem to be any available photographs
of the original structure, we are uncertain as to why Joyce described its
façade as “frowning”: a reasonable hypothesis might be that the uncomplimentary
adjective expresses Joyce’s memory of an architecturally grim portico perhaps reinforced
by his innate distaste for the missionizing efforts of the Salvation Army and
other such religious establishments.
The Salvation Army hostel is named Bethel in reference to
the biblical town of Beth-El (Hebrew: “House of God”) which is situated in the
Samarian hill country some twelve miles north of Jerusalem. Beth-El is
mentioned in Genesis as the place where Jacob spent his first night away from
home while fleeing from his elder twin brother Esau, who had threatened to take
murderous revenge on Jacob for having diddled him out of his birthright by
impersonating him when taking food to their blind father Isaac. While sleeping
in the open with a stone for his pillow, Jacob dreams of a ladder stretching
from heaven to earth on which angels ascend and descend. During the dream God
stands next to him and promises him that his descendants will inherit the land
on which he is lying. The vision startles Jacob out of his dream: “And Jacob
awoke out of his sleep and said: ‘Surely the Lord is in this place and I knew
it not.’ And he was afraid and said: ‘How awesome is this place. It is surely none
other than the house of God and the gateway to heaven.’… And he called the name
of the place Beth-El ” (Genesis 28:16-17; 19).
Throughout Ulysses, Bloom demonstrates some
familiarity with the Hebrew language and also a fairly deep awareness of Jewish
tradition, thanks to his upbringing by his Jewish father, Rudolph Virag
(“Flower” in Hungarian), although Rudolph – after emigrating to Ireland from
Hungary and changing his surname to “Bloom”– had converted to Protestantism in
order to marry Bloom’s mother, Ellen Higgins. In spite of his conversion, Rudolph
apparently kept up some Jewish observances, especially the Seder ritual on the
first night of Passover which Bloom recalls in some detail – if not “always accurately – in the Aeolus
episode of Ulysses.
Here too, on espying the “Bethel” Salvation Army hostel, Bloom
reflects on the Hebrew etymology of the
name of the institution. First he cogitates on the meaning of the second syllable
of the word Bethel )“El”( and allows himself a triumphant “yes” as he obviously decides
that “El” must denote “God” (although he does not pronounce the English
word “God” explicitly). He then recites to himself the first two letters of the
Hebrew alphabet “Aleph, Beth” and remembers that “Beth” means “house
of” – being the possessive form of the Hebrew word “bayit” (“a
house”). (Indeed the shape of the Hebrew letter “Beth” “ב” resembles a house, in common with most other Hebrew letters
whose forms hieroglyphically signify their meanings, e.g. “Dalet” “ד” – a door; “Vav” “ו”
– a hook; and “Shin” “ש” – a tooth). In this
rather convoluted fashion Bloom comes to the correct conclusion that “Bethel”
means “House of God”.
The town of Beth-El (“Bethel” in most English translations
of the Tanach), situated in the Samarian hills north of Jerusalem and peopled after Joshua’s conquest by the
tribe of Benjamin, has had a chequered history, both biblical and contemporary,
ever since Jacob was recorded as having
had a dream there of angels going up and down a ladder linking heaven and earth
climaxed by a divine promise that his descendants would inherit the land of
Canaan. After being taken by Joshua in a furious battle with the indigenous
Canaanites, Beth-El became an important center of Hebrew religious worship, and
during the time of the Judges the ark of the Covenant was kept there, prior to
its being moved to nearby Shiloh during the pre-regnal governance of Samuel,
the judge and prophet who at the people’s behest unwillingly oversaw the
transition to a monarchal system by anointing two successive kings over Israel:
first Saul, the tall modest Benjamite who “looked for asses and found kingship”
and later Saul’s Judean successor and nemesis – the wildly popular, young, heroic and handsome
David of Bethlehem. The Saul-David conflict initiated inter-tribal discord that
would eventually culminate in the splitting up of the nation into two kingdoms:
Judea in the south with Jerusalem as its capital and place of worship centered
on Solomon’s temple; and Israel (Samaria) in the north whose religious sites
were located at Bethel and nearby Gilgal. At these sites locally imbibed idolatrous
and amoral religious practices often overcame the monotheistic strictures of
the Torah to the unbridled anger of some of the great ethical prophets of the Tanach, such as Amos, Micah,
Hosea and Jeremiah. Thus Amos rages: “Do not seek Beth-El; do not go to
Gilgal…For Gilgal will surely go into exile, and Beth-El will be reduced to
nothing” (Amos 5:5).
In post-biblical times Bethel was apparently a village of
little importance, although Josephus Flavius records that Vespasian captured
the town during the Roman conquest of Canaan in the first century B.C.E.. It
was only two millennia later, in 1977, a decade after the Six Day War during
which the Jordanian-Palestinian West Bank (“Judah and Samaria”) was conquered
by Israel, that Gush Emunim (“The Bloc of the Faithful”), the messianic settler
arm of the right wing National Religious
Party, established the modern settlement of Beth-El, now inhabited by some
6,000 ideologically committed orthodox Jews, who are surrounded by a bevy of
Palestinian villages, inevitably resulting in an endless stream of security
tensions on both sides. No country has ever recognized Beth-El and its numerous
sister settlements in the West Bank as being legitimate, and the Israeli
Government has so far avoided annexing the territory. Beth-El is also outside
the umbrella of Jewish settlements in
the West Bank that successive Israeli governments intend to keep under permanent
Israeli control for security reasons when a peace settlement is finally reached
with the Palestinians, in exchange for giving the Palestinians, as compensation
for these areas, blocs of integral Israeli territory mainly situated south of the
Gaza Strip in a more or less quid pro quo arrangement.
So if such a long-awaited but apparently still far off
settlement is reached with the Palestinians, Beth El will return to Arab
control. Our right wing current Prime Minster, Binyamin Netanyahu, who is
ideologically averse to repatriating Jews who have settled in the West Bank (with
the historical connivance of both left and the right Israeli governments, it
must be said) has stated that he can foresee a situation whereby the
ideological settlers of Beth El and the other Gush Emunim sites who consider
holding on to the historical biblical sites of the Holy Land to be a primarily
religious priority that supersedes all other practical or political
considerations, might even prefer to continue to live in their settlements
under Palestinian governance, while still holding Israeli citizenship. Did anybody
say “messianic”?
Comments
Post a Comment